Nationalism, a mandatory show of theatre in India

India’s Supreme Court has triggered a huge controversy by making it compulsory to play the national anthem in cinemas across the country.

Senin, 23 Jan 2017 14:10 WIB

A Supreme Court order on playing the  national anthem in cinemas has reignited the debate around nat

A Supreme Court order on playing the national anthem in cinemas has reignited the debate around nationalism in India (Photo: The Quint)


India’s Supreme Court has triggered a huge controversy by making it compulsory to play the national anthem in cinemas across the country. 

The court order also requires everyone to honor the rule by standing up when the anthem is played. 

As Bismillah Geelani reports, the rule has led to harassment and the arrest of dozens of moviegoers, and calls are growing for the court to reconsider its decision.




Forty-eight-year-old Saleel Chaturvedi is a disability activist. Several years ago, an accident left him paralyzed from the waist down. 

That’s why when he went to a movie theatre in October he couldn’t stand up to show respect as the national flag appeared on the screen and the national anthem was played.

What came next was a rude shock for Chaturvedi.

“There was a couple behind me who sang the whole national anthem with great fervor and, in the middle of it, I got whacked at the back of my head and I turned around and the guy asked me to stand up,” recalls Chaturvedi. 

“I turned back to the screen and waited for the national anthem to get over,” he continued. 

“Then I turned back and I was so shell-shocked and I told him ‘just relax, I like the way you sang but why do you have to hit someone? You don’t even know the story here.’”

Chaturvedi hasn’t been to a movie theatre since.

“It just isn’t comfortable. Okay, this guy hit me but someone else could hit me harder. I have a spinal problem and the explanation of the fact that I’m disabled will happen much later. So I live in fear, I haven’t gone out,” Chaturvedi said.

But that was last year, when playing the national anthem in cinemas and standing for it was not even mandatory.

Now it is.

Last month, the Supreme Court ordered all cinema owners to make sure the national anthem is played at the beginning of every movie. 

The ruling came in response to a petition filed by social activist Shyam Narain Chowksy.  

He says he was mocked in a cinema hall when he stood up in respect as the national anthem was played in part of a film.

“I was shocked that instead of joining a person who was respecting the national anthem they were mocking and shouting at me for causing a disturbance. That day I realized how unaware people are about nationalism and I decided to do something about it,” Chowksy said.

Since the order came into force late last month, unruly scenes like this have been reported in several places. People like 35-year-old Rohit Kumar have been arrested and charged with disrespecting the national anthem for refusing to stand while it is played in cinemas.

But Kumar says the ruling is ridiculous. The anthem he says can’t make you patriotic, and respect for your nation is something you hold within.

The practice of playing the national anthem in cinemas was mandatory in the 1960s following the India-China War.

But it was slowly discontinued in most parts of the country when authorities realized that people were growing indifferent and inadvertently disrespecting it.

Now its reintroduction after decades has raised many eyebrows.

Among the critics are legal luminaries such as Soli Sorabjee, who believes the Supreme Court has overstepped its mandate with this order.

“Patriotism cannot be legislated, it cannot be judicially mandated. And I’m sure many people are patriotic even if they don’t stand up. The question is whether this a matter in which the judiciary should intervene?” Sorabjee asked. 

He continued, “judiciary enforces fundamental rights, very good; judicial activism has done good for the people especially the marginalized and exploited sections but in this matter I think the judiciary has gone a little haywire.”

Many say the move is an invitation to ultranationalists to harass those they deem less patriotic.

Senior journalist Shivam Vij argues the ruling even goes against the very philosophy of Rabindernath Tagore, who gave India its national anthem.

“Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore, the man who wrote the national anthem. He says that nationalism is a menace. He warned the people of India and the people of the world against nationalism saying that there is something even above nationalism and that’s humanity and what we are losing here is our sense of humanity,” appealed Vij.

While the government and Hindu nationalist groups have welcomed the ruling many have also challenged it.

The Supreme Court is likely to hear the matter again next month. 

 

Komentar

Beri Komentar

KBR percaya pembaca situs ini adalah orang-orang yang cerdas dan terpelajar. Karena itu mari kita gunakan kata-kata yang santun di dalam kolom komentar ini. Kalimat yang sopan, menjauhi prasangka SARA (suku, agama, ras dan antargolongan), pasti akan lebih didengar. Yuk, kita praktikkan!

Kalau Tak Setuju Ide Tes Keperawanan, Jangan Menyerang!

  • Jokowi: Kita Lebih Ingat Saracen, Ketimbang Momentum
  • SBY Bertemu Mega di Istana, JK: Bicara Persatuan
  • 222 Triliun Anggaran Mengendap, Jokowi Siapkan Sanksi Bagi Daerah
  • Wiranto Ajak 5 Negara Keroyok ISIS di Marawi
  • Jokowi: Dulu Ikut Presidential Threshold 20 Persen, Sekarang Kok Beda...

Wiranto: Kasus HAM Masa Lalu Sulit Diungkap

  • 131 TKI Ilegal Dideportasi Malaysia
  • Jasa Antar Obat RSUD Blambangan Banyuwangi
  • Pelatih Kritik Kualitas Liga 1